Brian J. DuBois’ criticism of Ryan Smith (“Criticism of new Auburn Planning Board member,” Jan. 19) seems misplaced.

Not knowing either person, I found the letter blaming Mr. Smith a bit conflicted.

The removal of Evan Cyr from the board was the decision of the City Council. Putting Mr. Smith on the Planning Board is a logical step reflecting the will of the Auburn voters for a change in direction. Mr. Cyr may still contribute as a member of the public at Planning Board meetings but no longer make decisions on how the city grows.

Our system allows for good people to disagree. If transparency is an issue, criticism should be directed at the decision makers, not the applicant for the seat.

I’ve heard the argument before that a conflict of interest exists when a person benefits from a decision in which that person participates. I find this to be a red herring, sometimes used by bureaucrats to eliminate opposing views. Whether it is a parent who is on the School Board, a pilot on the Airport Board or a realtor on the Planning Board, these people are in the trenches and may be the most effective at exposing problems or suggesting innovative solutions.

When Mr. Smith works within the system to get the rewards it offers but at the same time tries to improve it, he earns my vote.

This is not hypocrisy. More like sour grapes. Our city is ready for change.

Ron Russell, Auburn